索引于
  • 学术期刊数据库
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Bioavailability of a New Oral Spray Melatonin Emulsion Compared with a Standard Oral Formulation in Healthy Volunteers

Antonella Natalia Bartoli, Simona De Gregori, Mariadelfina Molinaro, Monica Broglia, Carmine Tinelli and Roberto Imberti

Background and Objective: Melatonin, a pineal gland hormone secreted at night, is involved in the sleep-wake cycle and has been extensively used in the treatment of primary sleeping disorders. Up to 90% of blood melatonin is cleared by the liver in a single passage, thus its half-life is very short (30-60 minutes). To avoid the first pass effect responsible for up to 90% loss of the melatonin oral dosage and to ensure rapid onset of activity, a new food grade liquid emulsion has been formulated in a spray form, which assures an additional increase of the contact surface and the possibility of efficient mucosal absorption.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the bioavailability profile of this new food grade liquid emulsion compared with a standard melatonin formulation in commercially available oral tablets.

Methods: In a single-dose, open-label, crossover study, eight subjects were randomly assigned to receive 5 mg of oral spray or oral melatonin (tablet). After a washout of one week, plasma was collected at six hours post dosing and assayed by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method to determine the main pharmacokinetic parameters.

Results and Discussion: The student t Test for paired data highlighted a significant difference between Cmax values (p=0.021) and the AUC (p=0.045). The absorption rate (Tmax) of the two melatonin formulations did not show statistically significant differences (Friedman test). The amount of melatonin reaching the systemic circulation after oral spray administration was significantly higher than after oral tablet administration.