索引于
  • 学术期刊数据库
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Ketorolac Tromethamine Sublingual Tablet: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Two-Sequence, Two-Period, Crossover Study to Assess the Bioequivalence between Two Formulations

Jessica Meulman, Marcelo Gomes Davanco, Fernando Costa, Fernando Bastos Canton Pacheco, Kadmiel Vinicio Santos Teixeira, Silvana Aparecida Calafatti Carandina, Celso Francisco Pimentel Vespasiano

Ketorolac Tromethamine is a non-hormonal anti-inflammatory drug, with potent analgesic action, used to short- term treatment of moderate to severe acute pain. In order to register a generic product in Brazil, it was performed a bioequivalence study under fasting conditions between two ketorolac tromethamine sublingual tablets. The study was designed and conducted in accordance with ethical principles and current legislation, presenting an open, randomized, with two treatments, two periods and two sequences crossover design. For this study, 32 healthy men and women were selected; however, 30 participants completed the study. Blood samples were collected serially up to 24 h post-drug administration and plasma concentrations of ketorolac were obtained by a validated bioanalytical method, using ketorolac-d5 as an internal standard. A non-compartmental model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters. Bioequivalence between test and reference formulation was demonstrated by constructing the 90% confidence intervals calculated for the corresponding ratios of the transformed data of the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax , AUC0-t and AUC0-inf . The point estimates and 90% confidence intervals obtained were 101.195 (96.12%-106.53%), 99.43% (95.27%-103.78%) and 98.93% (94.86%-103.16%), respectively. Considering these values are within the range of 80% to 125%, it is possible to conclude that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms rate and extent of absorption and, therefore, are interchangeable. Both formulations showed to be safe and well tolerated.