索引于
  • 学术期刊数据库
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Strategies for the Bioequivalence Assessment of Topical Dermatological Dosage Forms

Isadore Kanfer

The assessment of the bioequivalence of topical products not intended for absorption into the systemic circulation has presented a formidable challenge over the years. In particular, dermatological dosage forms such as creams, ointments, lotions and gels, apart from those containing topical corticosteroids, cannot readily be assessed for bioequivalence using “conventional” methodology and the only recourse to-date has been to undertake tedious, time consuming and expensive clinical end-point trials for such products. Although the human skin blanching assay (HSBA), also known as the vasoconstriction assay (VCA) has been successfully used for dermatological products containing topical corticosteroids and the methodology has found formal acceptance by a number of regulatory agencies, e.g. the US FDA amongst others, no surrogate methodology for the bioequivalence assessment of other topical dermatological products such as those containing non- steroidal anti-in fl ammatory drugs, anti-fungals, antibiotics and antivirals has yet found favour with regulatory agencies. Application of the HSBA, Tape Stripping (TS) and Dermal Microdialysis (DMD) for the assessment of bioequivalence is described and the theoretical basis and prognosis for each technique is presente

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证