索引于
  • 学术期刊数据库
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Study on Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Cefdinir Dispersible Tablet in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Cai-Li Zhang, Jian-Jie Jiao, Yan-Na Wu, Jun-qiu Song, Wei-Zhen Gao, De-Lu Ma and Jian-Shi Lou

Aim: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of cefdinir dispersible tablet with cefdinir capsule in healthy Chinese volunteers. Methods: cefdinir dispersible tablet and cefdinir capsule were used as the test and reference preparations respectively. Two randomized, comparative two-way crossover studies were conducted in 18 healthy Chinese male volunteers. Test preparation 200mg, reference preparation 200mg were administered once orally to the volunteers fasting overnight, with 5 days washout period between the doses of the test and reference preparations. Before dosing blood sample, after dosing several blood samples were collected for a period of 12 hours. The plasma concentrations of cefdinir at different times were determined by high performance liquid chromatogrphy (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Safety of the drug was evaluated. Results: The main pharmacokinetic parameters of the test and reference preparations were as follows: Cmax were 1.52±0.48μg/ml and 1.42±0.39μg/ml, T max were 3.08±0.73h and 3.22±0.81h, t 1/2 were 2.04±0.53h and 1.87±0.29h, AUC 0-t were 7.12±1.85 μg/ml•h -1 and 6.86±1.60μg/ml•h -1 AUC 0-∞ were 7.67±2.01μg/ml•h -1 and 7.38±1.85μg/ml•h -1 respectively. The relative bioavailability of test preparation was 103.53±11.50%. No significant differences between two preparations were found. The parameter mean values of the pharmacokinetic characteristics for test drug were within the bioequivalence acceptable range of 80~125% and 70~143% respectively for AUC and C max . Conclusion: The results indicate that the test preparation is bioequivalent to the reference preparation.