索引于
  • 学术期刊数据库
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面

抽象的

Vaccine Control of Avian Influenza H5N1 in Poultry: Need for a Positive Marker

Cassandra M Berry

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus strains have emerged as zoonotic viral pathogens over
the last decade and have eluded our serious attempts of control in domestic poultry by vaccination, with numerous countries continuing to have epidemic waves. Although the biology and genomics of H5N1 influenza viruses are well characterized, viral outbreaks still occur in domestic poultry, posing a dangerous threat of human transmission. There are two main types of current vaccines, inactivated whole virus vaccines and virus vaccines engineered by reverse genetics, both of which are administered with an adjuvant to hatchlings and optimally require a booster. However, immunological determinants of vaccine efficacy need to be considered distinctly in chickens and ducks. Our futile attempts to control H5N1 viral outbreaks in domestic poultry flocks question our capacity for future achievements of eradicating circulating H5N1 influenza viruses. There is a need for detection of infection and vaccination of domestic poultry to control potentially deadly but silent infection in vaccinated flocks. A positive marker strategy using tetanus
toxoid has several advantages over other negative markers to enable differentiation of infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) for more effective control programs of HPAI in order to minimize the likelihood of an avian H5N1 influenza pandemic.