索引于
  • 学术期刊数据库
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Bioequivalence Testing - Industry Perspective

Akula Thukaram Bapuji, Hamsa Lakshmi Venkata Ravikiran, Meda Nagesh, Syed Syedba, Datla Ramaraju, Chinnapu Reddy Jayaprakash Reddy, Sreedasyam Ravinder, Rosi Reddy Yeruva and Sutirtha Roy

Generic drugs are cost effective alternatives for the brand name drugs and the savings are estimated in the average $8 to $10 billion a year. Over the years the prescription of generic drugs has increased from 19% to 60-70% (1984: 19% & 2009- 60-70%). Bioequivalence testing is playing a vital role in generic drug development. But to make a generic drug enter in to a regulated market a company has to meet the stringent criteria in the same way as innovative drugs. But the criterion’s set forth by the regulatories are not always very descriptive and entrepreneur friendly. The prevailing fi erce competition also makes the manufacturers to keep low prices. In order to keep the tight price schedule for generic drugs one must have a clear picture on bioequivalence studies from industry perspective. There are some issues constantly faced by the industry for proper conduct of the BA/BE studies. The review article describes current regulatory requirements from various regulatory agencies and its impact on industry while designing a bioequivalence study and also highlights some of the common areas, which need to be addressed or commented upon. It is the time for industry to partner with regulatories to make bioequivalence studies and intern development of generic drugs more cost effective.