索引于
  • 学术期刊数据库
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Comparative Bioavailability of Two Tablet Formulations of Amifampridine with and without Food, and the Impact of Acetylator Status on the Pharmacokinetic Food Effect

Keith D. Gallicano*, Gary Ingenito, Ardeshir Khadang, Peter Boldingh

Background: Previous research has not evaluated whether the two pharmaceutically non-equivalent tablet products containing amifampridine, Ruzurgi® (amifampridine) and Firdapse® (amifampridine phosphate), are bioequivalent under fasted and fed conditions, and if acetylator status influences the magnitude of the food effect. Therefore, we compared the bioavailability of amifampridine tablet 10 mg relative to that of amifampridine phosphate tablet 10 mg (base equivalent) in the fed state following consumption of a high-fat meal and in the fasted state, and investigated the effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetics of amifampridine and its inactive 3-N-acetyl metabolite in subjects evaluated for slow or rapid/intermediate N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) metabolizer status.

Methods: Twenty (20) healthy, adult male and female volunteers were enrolled in this open-label, randomized, four-treatment, two-sequence, four-period, crossover, single-dose, oral comparative bioavailability and food-effect study. Eighteen (18) individuals (Male: 10; Female: 8; Slow NAT2 metabolizer: 9; Rapid/intermediate NAT2 metabolizer: 9), completed all four periods. Plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic characteristics of amifampridine and 3-N-acetyl amifampridine were determined by LC-MS/MS. Safety profiles of the two products were assessed from adverse events monitoring, medical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests.

Results: Compared to rapid/intermediate acetylators, slow acetylators had statistically significant 5.5- to 8.9-fold higher amifampridine Cmax and AUC and a 1.8-fold longer t½z (1.48 to 2.62 hours), and 22%-31% lower 3-N-acetyl amifampridine AUC and Cmax. Metabolite t½z values were similar between the two phenotypes (Rapid/intermediate: 3.50 hours; Slow: 3.66 hours). Under fasted and fed conditions, the 90% confidence intervals for the least-squares geometric mean ratios of the Test (Ruzurgi®) to Reference (Firdapse®) treatments were within the standard equivalence range (80%, 125%) for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ parameters for amifampridine and metabolite. For rapid/intermediate acetylators, the high-fat meal significantly decreased amifampridine AUC by 34%-40%, and Cmax by 69%. For slow acetylators, AUC was unaffected by food but Cmax decreased by 39%. The single oral doses were well tolerated under fasted and fed conditions.

Conclusion and implications: Peak and total plasma exposures of amifampridine and its metabolite were equivalent between the two products following a single 10-mg dose in either the fasted or fed state. Therefore, dosing regimens of Ruzurgi® and Firdapse® can be considered interchangeable in the fasted and fed states.

A high-fat meal decreased peak and total plasma exposures of amifampridine and 3-N-acetyl amifampridine, but the effect was more pronounced on amifampridine for rapid/intermediate acetylators, indicating the importance of knowing an individual’s acetylator status to avoid potential underdosing either product with a high-fat meal.