索引于
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 全球影响因子 (GIF)
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for the Determination of Traces of Veterinary Antibiotics and Steroid Hormones in Soil Based on Pressurised Liquid Extraction (PLE) and Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe (Modified-Quechers) Extraction

Marie-Virginie Salvia, Cécile Cren-Olivé, Laure Wiest, Robert Baudot and Emmanuelle Vulliet

Veterinary antibiotics and steroid hormones can be present at low levels in soil. Analytical methodologies are therefore necessary to analyse these compounds at the trace level in such a complex matrix. The goal of this work was to compare Pressurised Liquid Extraction (PLE), which is usually used to extract drugs from soil, and a modified-QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) method. Furthermore, several clean-up methods were evaluated. Selective Pressurised Liquid Extraction (SPLE) and Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction (dSPE) used after PLE and QuEChERS, respectively, were tested. These techniques permit a fast and simple purification step. SPE, which is frequently used, was also evaluated. To perform this comparison, both recoveries and matrix effects were compared and the analyses were performed using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). SPLE and dSPE did not significantly decrease matrix effects. A tandem SPE using SAX and Strata-X  cartridges offered the best efficiency. Regarding the comparison between PLE and QuEChERS, the modified-QuEChERS led to better recoveries for certain substances. No significant differences were noted in term of matrix effects. Therefore, the modified-QuEChERS method is recommended.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证