索引于
  • 在线访问环境研究 (OARE)
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 期刊目录
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 学者指导
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Crablet of Mangrove Crab, Scylla olivacea Rearing at the Different Salinity Regimes

Gunarto and Andi Parenrengi

High canibalisms in crablet of mangrove crab, S. olivacea stage was resulted lower juvenile crab production. The objectives of the research is to know the efectiveness of crablet rearing at the different salinity regimes in floating plastic glass individually to minimize canibalism. Research was conducted at mud crab hatcheri Marana Station of RICA Maros. Day-7 crablet produced from a hatchery, and then reared individually in plastic glass provided with small holes in glass to enter water inside the glass. Crablet were stocked inside of the plastic glass individually, then it sets in a floating cage constructed with bamboo fenced, where a piece of styrofoam as they float in surface water in the aquarium. Nine aquariums each size 29×60×34.5 cm randomly was filled 30 L saline water with different salinity regimes, i. e. (A) 5 ppt, (B) 10 ppt, (C) 20 ppt, (D) 30 ppt. Each treatment in the three replications. Monitoring was conducted on growth increment (total weight and carapace width) and survival rate of crablet during one month rearing. Water quality monitored on dissolved oxygen, water temperature and alkalinity. Result of the research was showing that the highest growth increment of crablet was obtained in A treatment (0.74 ± 0.13 g) and significantly different (P<0.05) with D treatment, but there was not significantly different (P>0.05) with B (0.57 ± 0.10 g) and C treatment (0.61 ± 0.15 g). The carapace width was significantly different (P<0.05) between A and B, A and D, B and C, B and D, C and D. The highest of survival rate (100%) was obtained in C treatment and significant different
(P<0.05) with A treatment (73.3 ± 11.55%). However, there were not significantly different (P>0.05) with B and D treatment.