索引于
  • 学术期刊数据库
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Current Issues on Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Determination

Chyung S. Cook

Methodologies for determining bioavailability and bioequivalence of endogenous compounds and macromolecules such as polymers are different from that of small exogenous compounds. In many cases, bioavailability and bioequivalence guidelines for exogenous molecules may not be appropriate for endogenous compounds. A common approach of baseline subtraction for endogenous materials is arguable in some cases, since levels of endogenous materials are highly variable during an experimental period. For polymers molecular weight distribution may be different among the materials from different manufactures and/or different manufacturing processes. These issues are addressed along with following issues regarding bioavailability/ bioequivalence determination: use of pharmacokinetic vs. pharmacodynamic parameters, use of a chiral assay vs. total assay for racemic drugs, and total vs. free concentration assays for drugs that exhibit concentration-dependent plasma protein binding, and for liposome/protein encapsulated formulations.