索引于
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 期刊目录
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 普罗奎斯特传票
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Discrepancies in ABO and Rh Grouping in Southeast Iran, an Analysis of 3 Years' Experience

Esmaei Sannei Moghaddam, Sohail Khosravi and Akbar Dorgalaleh

Background: ABO and Rh blood grouping discrepancies are significant causes of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. Most of these errors occur when blood grouping standards are unavailable or misinterpreted. This study determined the rate of such errors among hospitals in Zahedan, a city in southeast Iran. We also assessed the prevalence of ABO and Rh grouping errors in the Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO) in Zahedan.

Method: During the study, 30,254 blood bags were sent to five of Zahedan's hospitals. Pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping was carried out by slide method. Any sample showing a discrepancy between IBTO and hospital laboratory was returned to IBTO for identification of the error by the American Association of Blood Banking (AABB) standards protocol.

Results: We observed 420 discrepancies in the pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping of 30,254 units, a 1.4 percent error, among Zahedan hospitals. The most common error was misidentification of group A as O (62 cases), while group B was misidentified as O in 41 cases. We discovered critical errors, such as misdiagnosis of A as B and vice versa, which could endanger the patient’s life. We also noted 20 misidentifications in routine IBTO laboratory testing, a 0.02 percent error.

Conclusion: The high incidence of pre-transfusion blood grouping errors emphasizes the necessity of always using standard forward and reverse grouping tests in hospitals.