索引于
  • 在线访问环境研究 (OARE)
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 期刊目录
  • 西马戈
  • 乌尔里希的期刊目录
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 学者指导
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 虚拟生物学图书馆 (vifabio)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Effects of the Type of Fertilizer on the Taxonomic Composition and Zooplankton Distribution in Ponds of Batie in Western Cameroon

Kenfack Donhachi Aimérance*, Efole Ewoukem Thomas, Nana Towa Algrient, Zebaze Toguet Serge Hubert and Tchoumboue J

One of the major constraints in fish farming is the unavailability of good quality of fish fry which is highly dependent
on zooplankton. For this purpose, a study on the taxonomic composition and distribution of zooplankton in ponds in
the high plains of Western Cameroon was carried out from January 2016 to December 2017. A total of 12 samples were
monthly collected in order to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics of water and the diversity of zooplankton.
Results on water quality showed that the significantly (p<0.05) higher values of temperature (21.64 ± 0.81°C) and
dissolved oxygen (4.85 ± 1.54 mg/L) were observed with Wheat bran. For the zooplanktonic fauna, 39 species of which
35 are identified in ponds fertilized with pig manure and 30 in fish ponds fed with Wheat bran. From these species,
28 rotifers, 06 Cladocerans and 01 Copepods were identified in ponds fertilized with pig manure while 23 rotifers,
06 cladocerans and 01 copepod in fishponds fed with Wheat bran. Species such as Notholca sp, Platyias sp, Alona
rectangulata and Macrorhix laticornis were only represented in ponds fed Wheat bran (that is, a percentage of 10.26% of
the specific total richness). Meanwhile, 8 species Brachionus urcealaris, Keratella cochlearis, Keratella cochlearis var type,
Trichocerca similis, Polyarthra vulgaris, Filinia opoliensis, Ceriodaphnia cornuta and Diaphanosoma volzi were exclusively
represented in areas fertilized with pig manure (that is, a percentage of 23.08%). Generally, the season did not affect the
zoo planktonic distribution.