索引于
  • 打开 J 门
  • 学术钥匙
  • 研究圣经
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • CABI 全文
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Efficiency of improved cookstoves and emission of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide: An intervention study in Northern Ghana

Ali Moro

Biomass burning for home energy use is a major environmental health concern. Improved cooking technologies could generate environmental health benefits, yet prior results regarding reduced exposure to air pollution from improve cookstoves are mixed. In this study, 20 in-field uncontrolled cooking tests were conducted in domestic settings to assess the emission and efficiency of the Ace and the Jumbo stoves using the Emission Pod (EPOD) to measure emissions in real-time. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions, Emission Factors (EF), Modified Combustion Efficiency (MCE) and Cooking time were all calculated across a variety of meal types using the two stoves. Overall average CO emission was estimated at 248.71±44.66 ppm for the Ace stove while that of the Jumbo stove was calculated to be 103.66±24.4 ppm (P=0.024). The Jumbo stove had a higher MCE of 0.93 against the Ace stove (0.84). Using the partial capture Carbon Balance Method (CBM), EF was calculated for both stoves with the Ace recording a CO EF of 1425.04 g/kg and CO2 EF of 1318.35 g/kg. The Jumbo, on the other hand, had a CO EF of 151.57 g/kg and a CO2 EF of 1215.82 g/kg. The study concluded that although the stoves had better performance in most of the parameters studied compared to other stove interventions in the literature, they still fell short when compared with some of the traditional cooking methods. While the Jumbo falls within the International Workshop Agreement (IWA) tier 4 category guidelines for cookstove, the Ace stove which is much fancier falls in WHO-IWA category 0.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证