索引于
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 学者指导
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 普布隆斯
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Effect of Different Chemical Preservatives on Preservation of Pear Nectar

Qamar Liaqat, Said Wahab, Muhammad Ayub, Adnan Waheed, Irfan Ullah, Naeem Ullah, Murtaza Ali

Benzoate and Potassium sorbate separately and in combination with different concentration is used for the preservation of pear nectar. The samples were packed in 250 ml transparent plastic bottles at room temperature for a storage period of 90 days. The treatments were P0 (pear nectar with no preservative), P1 (pear nectar+0.1% Sodium benzoate), P2 (pear nectar+0.1% potassium sorbate), P3 (pear nectar+0.05% Sodium benzoate), P4 (pear nectar+ 0.05% Potassium benzoate) and P5 (pear nectar+0.05% Sodium benzoate and 0.05% Potassium sorbate). Samples of pear nectar were evaluated for total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, %acidity, pH, reducing and non-reducing sugar and sensory evaluation (color, flavor, taste and overall acceptability). pH decrease from 4.03 to 3.60, total soluble solids increase (14.90 to 16.03)%, acidity 0.93 to 1.02, ascorbic acid decrease 7.04 to 5.15, reducing sugar increase 18.03 to 18.28, non-reducing sugar decrease 3.88 to 3.40, color decrease 8.10 to 5.57, flavor 8.20 to 5.75, taste 8.10 to 5.60 and overall acceptability decreased 7.18 to 5.02 during period of storage. The results show that the storage period and treatments had a significant effect (p<0.05) on physicochemical and sensory evaluation of pear nectar. The nectar sample P5 was found best followed by P1, while P0 shows the poor results.