索引于
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 学术钥匙
  • 期刊目录
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 访问全球在线农业研究 (AGORA)
  • 国际农业与生物科学中心 (CABI)
  • 参考搜索
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 哈姆达大学
  • 亚利桑那州EBSCO
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 学者指导
  • SWB 在线目录
  • 普布隆斯
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
分享此页面
期刊传单
Flyer image

抽象的

Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Myrtus communis L. Essential Oils Treatments by Vapor Contact to Control Penicillium digitatum

Ladu G, Cubaiu L, d’Hallewin G, Pintore G, Petretto GL and Venditti T

Background: The antimicrobial activity of Essential Oils (EOs) has been used for centuries and nowadays the efforts to develop natural preservatives in postharvest management have augmented interest in their possible applications.

Materials and Methods: Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Myrtus communis L. EOs, and two of their components, α- and β-pinene, have been tested in vitro against Penicillium digitatum, with the aim to assess their antifungal effects when applied as fumigation. The pathogen, inoculated on PDA dishes, was treated by EO-vapors contact and the fungal growth inhibition was recorded in order to evaluate the EOs antifungal activity.

Results: The exposure to the EOs vapors shows different ability in the control of fungal growth related to the EO concentration used and the elapsed time between the fungal inoculum and EO vapor contact. The greatest antifungal activity was observed for rosemary EO, while a less control was found for the myrtle one. Treatment performed with α-pinene showed a control of the pathogen that was similar to the myrtle, whereas control with β-pinene was very poor.

Highlight: Our finding revealed that plant EOs could be successful in controlling fungal postharvest disease in a dose and compound dependent manner, but deeper researches are needed about treatment parameters because the effectiveness seems to be affected by treatment modalities.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证